Himachal Shikshak Kranti Manch

To Honorable Chief Minister, Govt. of Himachal Pradesh Subject: Allow no percentage in 10+2/graduation bar for appearing in TET in context of verdict byNainital High Court Sir, With regards, I want to have your kind attention in the matter of TET(teacher eligibility test) because the TET in HP has been conducted by imposing the percentage bar of 50% marks in 10+2/Graduation and 45% marks in same classes for Reserved categories as per the old directions issued by NCTE ,Delhi but the matter needs deep restrospection after the historical verdict by Uttarakhand High Court, Nainital whose important lines of decision are of our main concern as below:- Writ Petition No. 772 (SS) of 2011 (Baldev Singh and others Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others) was decided by an order dated 20.8.2011, holding the validity of TET and rejecting the claim of the petitioners regarding holding of such examination. At the same time, this Court also held that fixing the minimum percentage of marks in...

DECISION BY NAINITAL HIGH COURT ON T.E.T. 321 WRITS UPLOADED BY VIJAY KUMAR HEER IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1582 (SS) of 2011 Himanshu Upadhyay and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ...Respondents Mr. Deepak Bisht, Advocate present for the petitioners. Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand. Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad. Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education. With Writ Petition No. 1586 (SS) of 2011 Bharti Bisht and another .Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others .Respondents Mr. Kishore Kumar, Advocate present for the petitioners. Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand. Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad. Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate...