Posts

Showing posts with the label HIGH COURT NAINITAL DECISION ON T.E.T.

Remove percentage bar in JBT-TET eligibility conditions -Appeal to HP Board by Vijay Kumar Heer

To Honorable Secretary, H.P. Board of School Education, Dharamshala.  Subject: Remove percentage bar in JBT-TET eligibility conditions with reference to verdict of Uttarakhand High Court Honble. Sir, With regards, myself want to attract your kind attention in the case of minimum qualification criterias fixed for HP JBT-TET which are having paradoxical eligibility conditions in context of old R&P Rules 2008 for JBT recruitment. It is worthy to mention that the minimum eligibility percentage fixed for the JBT batch 2008-10 was either graduation with 45% marks or 10+2 with minimum 50% marks while JBTs of batch 2005-06 in Private Colleges had been recruited by fixing only 10+2 pass condition which makes them ineligible to appear in TET. In light of the above facts, it is clear enough that the variation in the R&P rules must be kept in mind while issuing the roll numbers to theses candidates. 10+2 with minimum 50% marks may not be implemented in context of R&P r...

Allow no percentage bar for appearing in TET in context of verdict by Nainital High Court- VIJAY KUMAR HEER

To Honorable Chief Minister, Govt. of Himachal Pradesh Subject: Allow no percentage in 10+2/graduation bar for appearing in TET in context of verdict byNainital High Court Sir, With regards, I want to have your kind attention in the matter of TET(teacher eligibility test) because the TET in HP has been conducted by imposing the percentage bar of 50% marks in 10+2/Graduation and 45% marks in same classes for Reserved categories as per the old directions issued by NCTE ,Delhi but the matter needs deep restrospection after the historical verdict by Uttarakhand High Court, Nainital whose important lines of decision are of our main concern as below:- Writ Petition No. 772 (SS) of 2011 (Baldev Singh and others Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others) was decided by an order dated 20.8.2011, holding the validity of TET and rejecting the claim of the petitioners regarding holding of such examination. At the same time, this Court also held that fixing the minimum percentage of marks in...