Himachal Shikshak Kranti Manch

To Honorable Chief Minister, Govt. of Himachal Pradesh Subject: Allow no percentage in 10+2/graduation bar for appearing in TET in context of verdict byNainital High Court Sir, With regards, I want to have your kind attention in the matter of TET(teacher eligibility test) because the TET in HP has been conducted by imposing the percentage bar of 50% marks in 10+2/Graduation and 45% marks in same classes for Reserved categories as per the old directions issued by NCTE ,Delhi but the matter needs deep restrospection after the historical verdict by Uttarakhand High Court, Nainital whose important lines of decision are of our main concern as below:- Writ Petition No. 772 (SS) of 2011 (Baldev Singh and others Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others) was decided by an order dated 20.8.2011, holding the validity of TET and rejecting the claim of the petitioners regarding holding of such examination. At the same time, this Court also held that fixing the minimum percentage of marks in

BIHAR ELEMENTARY TEACHERS' RECRUITMENT DECISION BY SUPREME COURT- UPLOADED BY VIJAY KUMAR HEER Judgement IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 297 OF 2007 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO.22882 OF 2004 Nand Kishore Ojha Vs. Anjani Kumar Singh O R D E R ALTAMAS KABIR, J. 1. As indicated in our order dated 9th December, 2009, this Contempt Petition has a background of alleged breach of an undertaking given on 18th January, 2006 and the order passed on the basis thereof on 23rd January, 2006 in SLP(C)Nos.22882- 22888 of 2004. The said undertaking related to the commitment made by the State of Bihar to recruit and fill in the vacant posts of teachers in Primary Schools with trained teachers. The undertaking given by the State of Bihar is in that context and reads as follows : “That in the meantime, it has been decided that trained teachers be recruited on the vacant posts available in the State of

DECISION BY NAINITAL HIGH COURT ON T.E.T. 321 WRITS UPLOADED BY VIJAY KUMAR HEER IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1582 (SS) of 2011 Himanshu Upadhyay and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ...Respondents Mr. Deepak Bisht, Advocate present for the petitioners. Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand. Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad. Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education. With Writ Petition No. 1586 (SS) of 2011 Bharti Bisht and another .Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others .Respondents Mr. Kishore Kumar, Advocate present for the petitioners. Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand. Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad. Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate